• youcantreadthis@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    It does not prove merit. Sorry. I don’t trust any ‘accomplishment’ of these systems in a field I do not understand thoroughly after being told about all their accomplishments in fields I did understand thoroughly that were bullshit pushed by people who only vaguely kind of understood what they were saying and were mostly wrong. Too many bullshit liars and cherry picking fanatics who understand nothing. Poisoned well.

      • youcantreadthis@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        I just don’t trust your shit and cannot verify.

        Everything I can verify in support of your point from people on your side of this debate is spectacular obvious bullshit that falls apart the moment I actually look.

        I just don’t trust lying liars who tell spectacular bullshit lies to not be lying when I don’t have the expertise to check.

          • youcantreadthis@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            27 days ago

            Only works when what you want is surface bullshit. Because it makes surface bullshit. I guess uses for surface bullshit.

            I know my software engineer compsci degree friends say its not helpful and has rendered actual resources useless. I’m going to trust general statements from experts I know over things from the sycophantic cultists of the bullshit pump that I cannot verify

            • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              27 days ago

              Again: python schism, hardware integration, Minecraft wizard math. Insulting people who politely explain counterexamples won’t make those counterexamples disappear. It’s just sticking your fingers in your ears until they touch.

              Reality is not defined by interpersonal trust, or by denial.

              • youcantreadthis@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                27 days ago

                Lying liars lie. I know they lie. I have verified they lie about other things. Constantly and boldly. This looks on surface like their other lies but on a subject I don’t know about.

                I shouldn’t even bitber to verify given total lack of credibility I’m more likely to believe a thing the current potus says is truth than one if you

                But I did ask experts I know know this stuff and I know aren’t actively lying to me and they say they haven’t found good uses like this it can’t do similar tasks and breaks the tools they used to use by being lying and bad so I don’t believe you safe to assume so you are either lying or amplifying a lie because you want to believe

                • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  This is conservatism. This is rejecting facts to place belief in persons. You have an ingroup that’s automatically right and smart and handsome, and an outgroup that’s wrong no matter what evidence they point to, and anyone saying what you already disagree with must be that outgroup. I’m not just ‘some fucker online,’ I’m ‘one of you.

                  If words don’t matter to you, why bother to speak?

                  • youcantreadthis@quokk.au
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    27 days ago

                    They’re not automatically right they’re just not proven constant bold faced liars. Who in every space I can check are lies. I do not trust you because you support the same claims as known liars that support an agenda known for lying. You are not some fucker online. You are showing you believe lying liars who lie then telling me a thing I cannot confirm is true is true. Why would I believe it.

                    A suspected lying liar who lies made a aim I could not check myself. A claim based on what I know about how these systems work is at the very least a strong read of facts if not an outright lie like all the claims I could look deeply at were. I went to experts who could confirm and they said what amounted to ‘basically no’. I literally did research with qualified credentialed experts who I trust who went to college about this and do it for rent money who I know know things because I have hired them or worked with them and they were super helpful and good at the thing. Multiple of them. I checked with multiple experts. Last time I bother wasting everyone’s time. You are in a cult.