It is clear that the signal to noise ratio of the WWW is getting worse. It’s much harder to find good content when using a good old search engine. And if it’s good it is usually hosted on Reddit or Stackexchange.

So remember, even if it’s easy too Google something (well, it isn’t nowadays), we want to create a fediverse of good content that helps people (I hope). So, it’s always better to write a real answer if you have the time and energy. Please help boost the SNR and reverse the AI fueled information degradation loop.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Jesus thank you. And also dont post screenshots of web pages. We’ve gotten much worse since the reddit exodus.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I will occasionally post a screenshot of an excerpt of a web site, specifically for the purpose of showing it to whoever I’m responding to who is continuing to bleat rather than visit the link I provided and use their eyes, or is attempting to argue with me about the presence of content that is, in fact, right there as plain as the nose on your face. Extra bonus points if whatever they need to click on to get what they want is right there in the header or sidebar menu, without even having to scroll or anything.

      I maintain that this method of saying, “look, dumbass” is perfectly valid.

    • fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If it’s for textual information, I’m personally a fan of covering all bases. Screenshot, link to site, and quoted relevant text.

      Webpages can change, but screenshots can stop being hosted with no warning and any text in screenshot form can’t easily be copy and pasted. Quoted text is essentially the longterm accessible failsafe. Text in comments tends to last much longer than images or links.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        Yes, its only a problem when folks include an image of text without copying the text and linking to the source.

        I’m not anti-image. I’m anti-ablism and anti-misinformation

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Only if they include the link.

      I prefer the screenshot to a webpage because

      1. If it’s a shit site, I don’t want to give it clicks and revenue

      2. News sites have a history of manipulating the title over and more to maximize views

      3. Images are easy to scan within the Lemmy app. Versus kicking me to a browser that has to fetch data somewhere.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Posting screenshots of webpages isn’t disallowed.

        But posting screenshots of webpages without a link to the source is temp-ban-worthy