The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to allow National Guard troops into Chicago after a lower court sided with the governor and blocked the deployment.
Dementia is really taking hold on poor old pervert.
I’m not, I’m criticizing this article taking up just that little bit more of the public’s bandwidth with stupid rhetoric. There’s more than enough that we should be worrying about and ample crimes he’s guilty of, why do we need to bother manufacturing evidence when there’s already overwhelming mountains of evidence just laying around? All this does is discredit our legitimate criticism by association and take up visual space that could be filled with real news.
Was this in any way consequential? Does this show any evidence of anything besides mispeaking? Wait no don’t answer that, I spectacularly don’t care. Instead of talking about something that actually matters you’re starting to drag us both into a debate about the evidentiary value of an old guy briefly mixing up two names that both start with ‘m’.
Isn’t, just maybe, that he’s trying to get troops deployed in US soil once again perhaps a little more important to discuss? But somehow that’s getting overshadowed by your eagerness to spar over the meaningless bullshit I’m criticizing, in a perfect example of my entire godsdamned point.
Ah, so now we’re pivoting from discussing my actual criticism of the article and how it spawns meaningless discussions to… another meaningless discussion, but this time with random gatekeeping thrown in.
I’m not, I’m criticizing this article taking up just that little bit more of the public’s bandwidth with stupid rhetoric. There’s more than enough that we should be worrying about and ample crimes he’s guilty of, why do we need to bother manufacturing evidence when there’s already overwhelming mountains of evidence just laying around? All this does is discredit our legitimate criticism by association and take up visual space that could be filled with real news.
was his slip up made up? did he not misstate yet another thing?
Why do you think more evidence is a bad idea?
has all the evidence so far done anything to his administration? …no? so maybe its a good idea to collect more evidence.
This is really simple stuff my dude
Was this in any way consequential? Does this show any evidence of anything besides mispeaking? Wait no don’t answer that, I spectacularly don’t care. Instead of talking about something that actually matters you’re starting to drag us both into a debate about the evidentiary value of an old guy briefly mixing up two names that both start with ‘m’.
Isn’t, just maybe, that he’s trying to get troops deployed in US soil once again perhaps a little more important to discuss? But somehow that’s getting overshadowed by your eagerness to spar over the meaningless bullshit I’m criticizing, in a perfect example of my entire godsdamned point.
agreed.
Im not in the USA
what are you doing about it? marching in the streets? hiding ICE targets in your home? protesting ICE raids?
Or sitting at home, picking your bumhole on the internet whining at me?
People who actually do subversive shit don’t talk about it on public social media.
bingo.
Ah, so now we’re pivoting from discussing my actual criticism of the article and how it spawns meaningless discussions to… another meaningless discussion, but this time with random gatekeeping thrown in.
Youre whining this article distracts from important topics.
So I changed over to discussing what I presume are important topics to you.
You instead flail. Its ok - keep crying but doing nothing. Its the American Way.
And now you’re trying cheap bait and personal attacks. Charming.
Youve made zero attempt beyond whining.
I’ve repeatedly explained my reasoning and position.
Then fuck off and let us focus on and deal with the real shit instead of the misnaming of shopping malls.