Very new to self hosting and truenas.

Got an old dell with 6x4tb of storage. Turns out they are all SAS drives and turns out hardware raid is the old thing now. Knowing none of this before what can I do with SAS drives connecting to my raid card (in photo) knowing that this is just a home NAS, SAS drives are more expensive and better to just go SATA.

What do you think?

Get a pcie to data, sell all the SAS drives and save up for 6x4tb of Seagate data drives?

What would you do with a dell server with old SAS drives if the end goal was a dependable home NAS for important home files?

I’m new to this so any input helps, thanks!

  • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    SAS drives tends to be top quality server stuff… I would keep them until the break then replace with cheaper sata.

    Unless you need something less power hungry (SSSs?) or less noisy.

    Also keep the hardware raid, why not. You should be able to remove the raid inside its bios and see the four disks individually.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      It is fine as long as you are just passing the disks directly to the OS. Do not use hardware raid for data storage.

  • felbane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is a PERC H700 which does not support IT mode (even if you cross-flash to an LSI firmware).

    You could use that card as-is but for truenas I’d suggest grabbing a proper SAS card. I got one off ebay (LSI 9207) for about USD$35 already flashed and ready to go.

    • rook@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Do you recommend SAS over SATA? What would I do of I wanted to move to SATA drives and already having data on the hardware raid? How would I transfer all that?

      • felbane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        For this use case there’s not really an advantage using SAS over SATA. I’d suggest buying SATA drives in the future just because you don’t need a SAS card for them, and SATA drives are usually cheaper.

        If you use the H700 for hardware RAID and switch to SATA later, your best bet is probably to copy the data over (or better, use the opportunity to test your backup/restore process).

        If you could run the SAS disks in JBOD mode (which is possible if you sell the H700 and use another SAS card), you could set up your drives in a RAIDZ1 mode and later switch to SATA drives by replacing one drive at a time and doing a scrub between each swap.

  • Nilz@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    You can often flash these raid cards into IT mode to disable raid and so that they just pass through the raw disks. That way you can hook up either SAS or SATA drives and run them with software raid of your choosing, like ZFS. SATA is probably the safer bet since you will be able to use them in a future build without issues, but there’s no issue with SAS.

    If you can’t flash this raid card to IT mode you can buy a cheap LSI 92xx card. They are quite common and cheap, and easy to flash to IT mode.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Why not just use what you have until you can afford to and/or need to upgrade? SAS drives are more expensive because they typically offer higher performance and reliability. Hardware raid may be “old” but it’s still very common. The main risk with it is that if your raid card fails, you’ll have to replace it with the same model if you don’t want to rebuild your server from scratch.

    I’ve been running an old Dell PowerEdge for several years with no issues.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      Hardware raid doesn’t do much to stop silent corruption. At the very least you want to run something like btrfs on top of it.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      While sas is faster, the difference is moot if you have even a modest nvme cache.

      I don’t know if it’s especially that much more reliable, especially I would take new SATA over second hand sas any day.

      The hardware raid means everything is locked together, you lose a controller, you have to find a compatible controller. Lose a disk, you have to match pretty closely the previous disk. JBOD would be my strong recommendation for home usage where you need the flexibility in event of failure.

    • rook@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What I’m worried about is that once one drive fails, then I won’t want to replace it because I want to go full SATA. But then that would mean my NAS storage would shrink and loose data.

      That means that I have to replace all drives to data at the same time, and if I have lots of data on the hardware said SAS drives. How do I transfer all that data to the new drives ?

      Any ideas? The best I can think of is to have 2 pcie cards one with the raid and another data. But how would they share the data if the SATA is not in the hardware raid pool.

  • dcatt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I don’t know that particular card (and can’t see the p/n) but you might be able to use sata drives just fine with a breakout cable (SFF-8087 → 4× SATA)

    • rook@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It has mini SAS connectors that have SAS connections on the other end.

      Do you think hardware raid is any good?

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Hardware raid limits your flexibility, of any part fails, you probably have to closely match the part in replacement.

        Performance wise, there’s not much to recommend them. Once upon a time the xor calculations weighed on CPU enough to matter. But cpus far outpaced storage throughput and now it’s a rounding error. They continued some performance edge by battery backed ram, but now you can have nvme as a cache. In random access, it can actually be a lability as it collapses all the drive command queues into one.

        The biggest advantage is simplifying booting from such storage, but that can be handled in other ways that I wouldn’t care about that.

  • Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I picked up an old Dell server some time ago and wound up finding firmware that made the RAID card passthrough so that TrueNAS could have direct access to disks for ZFS

    That server was all SATA based so I’m not sure what options you’ll have, but it’s worth looking into.

    Ultimately, my thinking is that just because there’s something “better” out there doesn’t mean you shouldn’t work with what you have.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    There’s nothing wrong with hardware raid. You can probably pass them through as individual drives.

    I would use them as is but only buy sata going forward.

    • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Not with ZFS and their for TrueNAS. A hardware raid card is not suitable at all. Even if you set it to jbod mode. It shut actually be flashed to IT mode if that is possible with that card.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    You’ve already got it, why not use it? There’s nothing wrong with it. Hardware raid is fine, and sas drives are usually cheaper, actually, because not as many people want them.

    • rook@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It shows up in try has as one big 18TB drive (I have 24tb, so raid is working).

      How do I configure that? Just put it in one pool? In truenas terms what do I do with the 18tb?

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Oh, if you want to run truenas, then replace the controller with a 9211-8i or similar, and put it in IT mode so that truenas can see the raw disks.

        You can tell truenas to use it as one big pool, and it’ll work fine, but you’ll lose the native disk health monitoring (I assume truenas has some, I’ve never used it).