• ArchRecord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    For those who don’t care to read the full article:

    This basically just confines any cookies generated on a page, to just that page.

    So, instead of a cookie from, say, Facebook, being stored on site A, then requested for tracking purposes on site B, each individual site would be sent its own separate Facebook cookie, that only gets used on that site, preventing it from tracking you anywhere outside of the specific site you got it from in the first place.

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 days ago

      Hahahahaha so it doesn’t break anything that still relies on cookies, but neuters the ability to share them.

      That’s awesome

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Honestly, I thought that’s how it already worked.

        Edit: I think what I’m remembering is that you can define the cookies by site/domain, and restrict to just those. And normally would, for security reasons.

        But some asshole sites like Facebook are cookies that are world-readable for tracking, and this breaks that.

        Someone correct me if I got it wrong.

        • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 days ago

          Total Cookie Protection was already a feature, (introduced on Feb 23st 2021) but it was only for people using Firefox’s Enhanced Tracking Protection (ETP) on strict mode.

          They had a less powerful third-party cookie blocking feature for users that didn’t have ETP on strict mode, that blocked third party cookies on specific block lists. (i.e. known tracking companies)

          This just expanded that original functionality, by making it happen on any domain, and have it be the default for all users, rather than an opt-in feature of Enhanced Tracking Protection.

      • ours@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        As long as it’s not Chromium, I’m happy people aren’t just handing over the keys to the Internet to Google.

      • croaker@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 days ago

        I haven’t seen anything to signal Mozilla is untrustworthy other than from that one right wing guy with a chip on his shoulder.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          The Mozilla Corporation is a for profit entity owned by the non-profit Mozilla Foundation, which lets them claim to be a nonprofit, which is a sketchy looking way to set up and promote your business if nothing else. They get most of their money from Google and they’ve been riding AI like all the other unethical companies.

          I see absolutely no reason to give them a chance, either. Just use an actual open source build instead of the mainstream one.