Only works when what you want is surface bullshit. Because it makes surface bullshit. I guess uses for surface bullshit.
I know my software engineer compsci degree friends say its not helpful and has rendered actual resources useless. I’m going to trust general statements from experts I know over things from the sycophantic cultists of the bullshit pump that I cannot verify
Again: python schism, hardware integration, Minecraft wizard math. Insulting people who politely explain counterexamples won’t make those counterexamples disappear. It’s just sticking your fingers in your ears until they touch.
Reality is not defined by interpersonal trust, or by denial.
Lying liars lie. I know they lie. I have verified they lie about other things. Constantly and boldly. This looks on surface like their other lies but on a subject I don’t know about.
I shouldn’t even bitber to verify given total lack of credibility I’m more likely to believe a thing the current potus says is truth than one if you
But I did ask experts I know know this stuff and I know aren’t actively lying to me and they say they haven’t found good uses like this it can’t do similar tasks and breaks the tools they used to use by being lying and bad so I don’t believe you safe to assume so you are either lying or amplifying a lie because you want to believe
This is conservatism. This is rejecting facts to place belief in persons. You have an ingroup that’s automatically right and smart and handsome, and an outgroup that’s wrong no matter what evidence they point to, and anyone saying what you already disagree with must be that outgroup. I’m not just ‘some fucker online,’ I’m ‘one of you.’
If words don’t matter to you, why bother to speak?
They’re not automatically right they’re just not proven constant bold faced liars. Who in every space I can check are lies. I do not trust you because you support the same claims as known liars that support an agenda known for lying. You are not some fucker online. You are showing you believe lying liars who lie then telling me a thing I cannot confirm is true is true. Why would I believe it.
A suspected lying liar who lies made a aim I could not check myself. A claim based on what I know about how these systems work is at the very least a strong read of facts if not an outright lie like all the claims I could look deeply at were. I went to experts who could confirm and they said what amounted to ‘basically no’. I literally did research with qualified credentialed experts who I trust who went to college about this and do it for rent money who I know know things because I have hired them or worked with them and they were super helpful and good at the thing. Multiple of them. I checked with multiple experts. Last time I bother wasting everyone’s time. You are in a cult.
Are you using an LLM for this repetitive finger-pointing?
Trust is not a factor. Claims are evaluated. But you aggressively do not want more detail about any specific fact; you pre-emptively dismiss any contrary evidence as “cherry-picking.”
There is no everyone here. It’s just you and me and you want to blather without listening.
I checked. I couldn’t verify deeper myself no domain expertise I went to people who I knew could and they confirmed it was not an indicator of general utility I’m sorry you can’t deal withypur lies not being believed I’m sure you put a lot of work into them it must not feel very good and I’m sorry all that work was wasted
Spectacular bullshit like ‘it kinda works sometimes.’
Only works when what you want is surface bullshit. Because it makes surface bullshit. I guess uses for surface bullshit.
I know my software engineer compsci degree friends say its not helpful and has rendered actual resources useless. I’m going to trust general statements from experts I know over things from the sycophantic cultists of the bullshit pump that I cannot verify
Again: python schism, hardware integration, Minecraft wizard math. Insulting people who politely explain counterexamples won’t make those counterexamples disappear. It’s just sticking your fingers in your ears until they touch.
Reality is not defined by interpersonal trust, or by denial.
Lying liars lie. I know they lie. I have verified they lie about other things. Constantly and boldly. This looks on surface like their other lies but on a subject I don’t know about.
I shouldn’t even bitber to verify given total lack of credibility I’m more likely to believe a thing the current potus says is truth than one if you
But I did ask experts I know know this stuff and I know aren’t actively lying to me and they say they haven’t found good uses like this it can’t do similar tasks and breaks the tools they used to use by being lying and bad so I don’t believe you safe to assume so you are either lying or amplifying a lie because you want to believe
This is conservatism. This is rejecting facts to place belief in persons. You have an ingroup that’s automatically right and smart and handsome, and an outgroup that’s wrong no matter what evidence they point to, and anyone saying what you already disagree with must be that outgroup. I’m not just ‘some fucker online,’ I’m ‘one of you.’
If words don’t matter to you, why bother to speak?
They’re not automatically right they’re just not proven constant bold faced liars. Who in every space I can check are lies. I do not trust you because you support the same claims as known liars that support an agenda known for lying. You are not some fucker online. You are showing you believe lying liars who lie then telling me a thing I cannot confirm is true is true. Why would I believe it.
A suspected lying liar who lies made a aim I could not check myself. A claim based on what I know about how these systems work is at the very least a strong read of facts if not an outright lie like all the claims I could look deeply at were. I went to experts who could confirm and they said what amounted to ‘basically no’. I literally did research with qualified credentialed experts who I trust who went to college about this and do it for rent money who I know know things because I have hired them or worked with them and they were super helpful and good at the thing. Multiple of them. I checked with multiple experts. Last time I bother wasting everyone’s time. You are in a cult.
Are you using an LLM for this repetitive finger-pointing?
Trust is not a factor. Claims are evaluated. But you aggressively do not want more detail about any specific fact; you pre-emptively dismiss any contrary evidence as “cherry-picking.”
There is no everyone here. It’s just you and me and you want to blather without listening.
I checked. I couldn’t verify deeper myself no domain expertise I went to people who I knew could and they confirmed it was not an indicator of general utility I’m sorry you can’t deal withypur lies not being believed I’m sure you put a lot of work into them it must not feel very good and I’m sorry all that work was wasted
Troll harder.