Any article that even slightly mentions that AI exists is tagged as vibecoding, even when they have nothing to do with it. It:s getting out of hand. EXAMPLE 1: <a href=“https://lobste.rs/s/ly0vif/my_students” rel=“ugc”>https://lobste.rs/s/ly0vif/my_students</a> Tagged as vibecoding, article contains a single passing reference <blockquote> where people are racing to create intelligent machines, but only in order to make them slaves </blockquote> EXAMPLE 2 (my own article; biased) <a href=“https://lobste.rs/s/vufbvv/user_doesn_t_care_you_should” rel=“ugc”>https://lobste.rs/s/vufbvv/user_doesn_t_care_you_should</a> I quoted a SINGLE example of someone putting an agentic spin on an old trope: <blockquote> “Users don’t care whether the code was written by AI or by hand, or which framework you used. They care that the product works.” </blockquote> EXAMPLE 3 <a href=“https://lobste.rs/s/gefcox/jolt_clojure_interpreter_on_janet” rel=“ugc”>https://lobste.rs/s/gefcox/jolt_clojure_interpreter_on_janet</a> This is a code repo. There is no AGENTS.md, or CLAUDE.md, or any mention of AI in the readme… EXAMPLE 4: this post, which someone will inevitably tag as “vibecoding”