Intelligent car headlights can cost as little as $200 to produce.
I understand what you are saying about added complexity and difficulty to replace.
This is a matter of public safety though. People die because they are blinded by other drivers headlights. It’s also a quality of life issue. Nobody is happy with the brightness of modern headlights.
I mentioned the car stereo as an example because the components are ridiculously cheap to produce. Terrible quality tweeters that are installed in Bose and Harmon Kardon systems cost about $3 per pair to produce. If you want to buy OEM replacement you pay about $120, for the same $3 speakers.
While there won’t be a big aftermarket selling compatible headlights I think car makers will be installing them at cost into every car, rather than profiting from people who select an expensive and overpriced add-on.
Car stereos really don’t cost the kind of money now. You are referring to a time that is long gone. I’m not exaggerating when I say they cost more.
We’re clearly talking about two very different things here because I’m not talking about after market parts and additionally you aren’t taking into account that this is not a situation where you can just slap an after market part with a fuse and an adapter in there and call it good.
Cars these days have a lot more computer modules in them. This headlight has a module in each side to control the automatic headlights and high beams, and it’s supposed to talk to another module that connects it with a ride height sensor for auto leveling so that when you put something in the back of the truck it auto adjusts. That’s why it’s $1000 just for the part.
To install that headlight at a dealer you’d be looking at at least 2 hours of labor because it doesn’t just pop out anymore (because as these headlights being so expensive makes them a target for theft and resale). In newer vehicles they bolt a lot of stuff on top of each other (grille trim, radiator fan supports etc) to make it harder to steal and harder for a customer to replace on their own).
While radio/stereo prices have come down significantly as the demand has gone up, this doesn’t necessarily mean you’re not paying just because it’s a mandatory or standard feature). It just means they add that to the sticker price of an alternative expensive vehicle.
People die because they are blinded by other peoples headlights because they don’t know how to use the features of the vehicles they own. They aren’t taught to do things they should because they rely on features that “make things safer”. Yes. I am positive backup cameras and backup sensors have save a lot of lives. But if you can’t back up a vehicle without those aids you shouldn’t be driving it. If you can’t park a vehicle without parking aids, you shouldn’t be driving it.
Replacing something like this (a component that lots of people break because they can’t drive and are bad at understanding how big their vehicles are) will be expensive to the consumer.
And additionally this is a component that is necessary for safety so it’s the type of thing that will cause more problems in the event that it fails because any after market part will have to communicate with the rest of the system already factory installed in the vehicle. This isn’t the type of thing where when it fails you can just ignore it like you might if you didn’t want to replace your Bluetooth or your heat was blowing cold.
If a product is being made it will be used to profit off people. Yes even in the aftermarket. Doesn’t matter how cheaply they can make it. It matters whether they can sell it and what price the market will bear.
At a time when everything around us is getting more expensive not because it’s necessarily more expensive to make but because the line must go up and companies want to keep seeing record profits, you seem to believe that automakers are going to just make the decision to not do that.
And that’s ignoring all the parts and components they still have on backorder.
Things that are a matter of public safety don’t necessarily reach the bar where automakers will do that over what is profitable. Just look at the number of SUV’s and pickup trucks that are so huge that the driver can’t see pedestrians or at times other vehicles in front and to the sides of them.
You make some good points but I really disagree with your statement that auto deaths are caused by drivers inability to use their cars features. Yes most fatalities are probably avoidable and are caused by bad and distracted drivers. But your example of back up cameras being unnecessary is a poor one. They are mandated because children walk behind cars and they’re too small to see in mirrors. With headlights, a driver cannot adjust their headlights to be less bright if they are already on low. These intelligent lights don’t just control high and low beams. They will actually black out a circle so that the beams don’t shine at other cars but shine around them.
The issue is really that modern headlights are too bright. LED headlights are great but their output needs to be limited. Consumers should have a choice between vehicles with headlights that are less bright and vehicles with intelligent headlights.
Before we had the backup camera we had sensors. I have sensors on my car.
But I think you have missed the forest for the trees here. I used to backup camera example because people no longer use their mirrors as they should (both should do and should learn to do), which makes it overly dangerous for all of us. When the backup camera stops working, can they backup without it?
Backup cameras are one of those technical parts of the car that invariably are mounted in places prone to corrosion. I’ve seen my fair share of malfunctions with them and come across several people who “can’t drive without them”. Their words, not mine. Backup camera lenses get dirty, cloudy, or otherwise become obscured in inclement weather and people often break other things (property, people, pets etc) backing up without them because they are over-reliant on them. I feel the same way about people who don’t look over their shoulder or at their mirrors before turning anymore because the side proximity warning sensors on their car will alert them so it’s fine. No matter that the sensors in those things can get false readings from other signals like those in some key fobs.
And do not get me started on crap like blue cruise that people think is self driving and just use without paying attention to the road.
So yes, their over reliance on the tech in their vehicle hinders their ability to use the low tech options that are available and much more reliable. This happens all the time. Some of it is obviously negligence. Some of it is down to the fact that people should be required to show they can operate the vehicle without these features because there is likely to come a time when one or more of them will be out of commission and require maintenance.
Either way my argument isn’t that these headlights in particular will make people less safe. it is that overreliance on technology prevents people from learning necessary skills that should be required to be licensed to operate a 4 ton machine at speed with other people on the road.
Intelligent car headlights can cost as little as $200 to produce.
I understand what you are saying about added complexity and difficulty to replace.
This is a matter of public safety though. People die because they are blinded by other drivers headlights. It’s also a quality of life issue. Nobody is happy with the brightness of modern headlights.
I mentioned the car stereo as an example because the components are ridiculously cheap to produce. Terrible quality tweeters that are installed in Bose and Harmon Kardon systems cost about $3 per pair to produce. If you want to buy OEM replacement you pay about $120, for the same $3 speakers.
While there won’t be a big aftermarket selling compatible headlights I think car makers will be installing them at cost into every car, rather than profiting from people who select an expensive and overpriced add-on.
Car stereos really don’t cost the kind of money now. You are referring to a time that is long gone. I’m not exaggerating when I say they cost more.
We’re clearly talking about two very different things here because I’m not talking about after market parts and additionally you aren’t taking into account that this is not a situation where you can just slap an after market part with a fuse and an adapter in there and call it good.
Cars these days have a lot more computer modules in them. This headlight has a module in each side to control the automatic headlights and high beams, and it’s supposed to talk to another module that connects it with a ride height sensor for auto leveling so that when you put something in the back of the truck it auto adjusts. That’s why it’s $1000 just for the part.
To install that headlight at a dealer you’d be looking at at least 2 hours of labor because it doesn’t just pop out anymore (because as these headlights being so expensive makes them a target for theft and resale). In newer vehicles they bolt a lot of stuff on top of each other (grille trim, radiator fan supports etc) to make it harder to steal and harder for a customer to replace on their own).
While radio/stereo prices have come down significantly as the demand has gone up, this doesn’t necessarily mean you’re not paying just because it’s a mandatory or standard feature). It just means they add that to the sticker price of an alternative expensive vehicle.
People die because they are blinded by other peoples headlights because they don’t know how to use the features of the vehicles they own. They aren’t taught to do things they should because they rely on features that “make things safer”. Yes. I am positive backup cameras and backup sensors have save a lot of lives. But if you can’t back up a vehicle without those aids you shouldn’t be driving it. If you can’t park a vehicle without parking aids, you shouldn’t be driving it.
Replacing something like this (a component that lots of people break because they can’t drive and are bad at understanding how big their vehicles are) will be expensive to the consumer.
And additionally this is a component that is necessary for safety so it’s the type of thing that will cause more problems in the event that it fails because any after market part will have to communicate with the rest of the system already factory installed in the vehicle. This isn’t the type of thing where when it fails you can just ignore it like you might if you didn’t want to replace your Bluetooth or your heat was blowing cold.
If a product is being made it will be used to profit off people. Yes even in the aftermarket. Doesn’t matter how cheaply they can make it. It matters whether they can sell it and what price the market will bear.
At a time when everything around us is getting more expensive not because it’s necessarily more expensive to make but because the line must go up and companies want to keep seeing record profits, you seem to believe that automakers are going to just make the decision to not do that.
And that’s ignoring all the parts and components they still have on backorder.
Things that are a matter of public safety don’t necessarily reach the bar where automakers will do that over what is profitable. Just look at the number of SUV’s and pickup trucks that are so huge that the driver can’t see pedestrians or at times other vehicles in front and to the sides of them.
You make some good points but I really disagree with your statement that auto deaths are caused by drivers inability to use their cars features. Yes most fatalities are probably avoidable and are caused by bad and distracted drivers. But your example of back up cameras being unnecessary is a poor one. They are mandated because children walk behind cars and they’re too small to see in mirrors. With headlights, a driver cannot adjust their headlights to be less bright if they are already on low. These intelligent lights don’t just control high and low beams. They will actually black out a circle so that the beams don’t shine at other cars but shine around them.
The issue is really that modern headlights are too bright. LED headlights are great but their output needs to be limited. Consumers should have a choice between vehicles with headlights that are less bright and vehicles with intelligent headlights.
Before we had the backup camera we had sensors. I have sensors on my car.
But I think you have missed the forest for the trees here. I used to backup camera example because people no longer use their mirrors as they should (both should do and should learn to do), which makes it overly dangerous for all of us. When the backup camera stops working, can they backup without it?
Backup cameras are one of those technical parts of the car that invariably are mounted in places prone to corrosion. I’ve seen my fair share of malfunctions with them and come across several people who “can’t drive without them”. Their words, not mine. Backup camera lenses get dirty, cloudy, or otherwise become obscured in inclement weather and people often break other things (property, people, pets etc) backing up without them because they are over-reliant on them. I feel the same way about people who don’t look over their shoulder or at their mirrors before turning anymore because the side proximity warning sensors on their car will alert them so it’s fine. No matter that the sensors in those things can get false readings from other signals like those in some key fobs.
And do not get me started on crap like blue cruise that people think is self driving and just use without paying attention to the road.
So yes, their over reliance on the tech in their vehicle hinders their ability to use the low tech options that are available and much more reliable. This happens all the time. Some of it is obviously negligence. Some of it is down to the fact that people should be required to show they can operate the vehicle without these features because there is likely to come a time when one or more of them will be out of commission and require maintenance.
Either way my argument isn’t that these headlights in particular will make people less safe. it is that overreliance on technology prevents people from learning necessary skills that should be required to be licensed to operate a 4 ton machine at speed with other people on the road.