fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agough i wishmander.xyzimagemessage-square329fedilinkarrow-up11.33Karrow-down119
arrow-up11.31Karrow-down1imageugh i wishmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square329fedilink
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-229 days agoGood news! As long as its given consentually then human milk is vegan! Gross edit: some body builders buy it to bulk up!
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·29 days agothe vegan society definition makes no mention of consent.
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·28 days agoThat could be! Despite that, a big part of minimizing harm is consent!
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·28 days agoI found something similar to our vegan debate! Polution! Its ever increasing year over year, but efforts to reduce pollution have reduced the rate of increase. Would you argue that since pollution increases year over year that we should abandon our current efforts as its clear they aren’t working?
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·27 days agowe should do things that are effective at tackling our problems. your question is too broad to answer with any more specificity.
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·27 days agoI dont need specifics because the proof is already there that whatever is being done now isnt working. Just like you argue that efforts to reduce animal consumption are proven futile by the increase in animal consumption year over year.
Good news! As long as its given consentually then human milk is vegan!
Gross edit: some body builders buy it to bulk up!
the vegan society definition makes no mention of consent.
That could be! Despite that, a big part of minimizing harm is consent!
not necessarily
Correct!
I always am
I found something similar to our vegan debate! Polution!
Its ever increasing year over year, but efforts to reduce pollution have reduced the rate of increase.
Would you argue that since pollution increases year over year that we should abandon our current efforts as its clear they aren’t working?
we should do things that are effective at tackling our problems. your question is too broad to answer with any more specificity.
I dont need specifics because the proof is already there that whatever is being done now isnt working. Just like you argue that efforts to reduce animal consumption are proven futile by the increase in animal consumption year over year.