• idriss@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Claude as a top contributor

    Sure buddy, all your 0 users appreciate all the packaging you do

  • JustVik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Realease only source code if you don’t like packaging, just list all dependencies and building method(I prefer Makefile :)). For me it’s ok enough.

  • ivan@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    IMO optimal way to package NodeJS apps for Linux specifically is to just make Linux x86-64 executables through SEA.

    I think it’s okay to do just that, especially if one of main concerns is how fast it works.

  • lastweakness@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    If you’re making a rust CLI/TUI project, keep it simple. Have a cargo release, binaries generated by CI/CD and if you want, packages for whatever Linux distro you’re personally using. Definitely don’t start with npm… Yeah this person has no one to blame but themselves.

  • Dookieman12@piefed.socialBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    As a Linux user, I hate trying to download and use software.

    Each of these installation methods has prerequisites which may or may not be installed, start again.

    Ok, it’s installed, but this isn’t actually the latest version, so the feature I wanted is janky and the documentation is out of date.

    Ok, the latest version isn’t actually compatible with my version of my OS. Guess I’ll try something else.

    And start the cycle over again.