shoulderoforion@fedia.io to Technology@lemmy.world · 1 year agoBig loss for ISPs as Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to $15 broadband lawarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up1310arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1307arrow-down1external-linkBig loss for ISPs as Supreme Court won’t hear challenge to $15 broadband lawarstechnica.comshoulderoforion@fedia.io to Technology@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square11fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareLovingHippieCat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up159·1 year agoI wish this wasn’t being framed with “Big loss for corporations” and instead was being framed as “Big win for consumers.”
minus-squarechakan2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down4·1 year agoExcept it’s not. I was excited when I read the headline…it’s only for people under an income threshold. It’s going to turn broadband into healthcare as they try to make up that profit.
minus-squaresunzu2@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareSludgehammer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 year agoInsert They’re_the_ same_picture.jpg here.
minus-squarePasserby6497@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoIn outcome, sure. But there’s a very big difference in the meaning behind the story.
I wish this wasn’t being framed with “Big loss for corporations” and instead was being framed as “Big win for consumers.”
Except it’s not. I was excited when I read the headline…it’s only for people under an income threshold.
It’s going to turn broadband into healthcare as they try to make up that profit.
deleted by creator
Insert They’re_the_ same_picture.jpg here.
In outcome, sure. But there’s a very big difference in the meaning behind the story.
deleted by creator