• bluGill@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Algorithms done right are useful. Make sure things that are likely important to be bubble to the top. I don’t have time to read/watch it all, so prioritize the important things for me.

    Done right is the hard part. It is too easy to prioritize memes that make people angry even though if you really investigate you discover that while there is a little truth it is grossly exaggerated and whoever is being mocked isn’t that stupid - because things that make people mad tend to get attention.

    The algorithm really needs a “there is plenty more but you have seen all the important stuff - go outside and do something” after I’ve seen what is important. Of course it then needs a “but I’m currently confined to a hospital bed so just show me something so I’m not bored out of my mind”. The likes of facebook of course cannot allow such a thing as once you stop scrolling their ad revenue is gone. However that is what the world needs.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The only problem with RSS is that it doesn’t work for many many news sources as well as niche interests.

      The RSS feeds on most of my country’s news sources are literally a headline with a link to their website. Plus the ones that it does work for break multiple times per year (at least on feeder) so being able to actually fetch the article is a toss up. Right now even with freshly added feeds, 9 out of 10 are “cannot fetch full article”.

      I find most people’s blogs rather boring and uninspired or extremely longwinded. I much prefer the kind of organic conversations from forums. Algorithms point me to the 4-5 pieces of content from people that I find interesting. I don’t often subscribe to them because their other content is not as interesting.

      With RSS feeds I would have to manually search through hundreds of articles and blog posts just to find 3 that I might actually be interested in. For example the less niche Phoronix has like 20 articles per day that are essentially fluff article padding updates like “video acceleration improvements merged for Mesa 25”. Like I don’t care at all. But the LACT Intel support addition I would be interested in 10 articles down.

    • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The companies deploying the algorithms aren’t taking any of what you said into consideration though. They only want to feed you what has the most interaction as that can garner the most money from ad revenue.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Would be nice if open-source aggregators like Lemmy allowed users to “Subscribe” to community developed algorithms.

        I’d love to (attempt) to build an “ethical” algorithm for content sorting, have it be open-source, and be able to have clients use it without having to actually modify the client itself.

        • Dran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          There’s nothing preventing you from forking a Lemmy client or server to prototype this. Depending on how you implement the activitypub backend, you might be able to make it transparent to a user if you present an algorithm as an array of cross posts via a /c/ of a server.

          Anything more might require forking a client, which might be easier to implement but may be harder to convince a large userbase to migrate to.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Reddit used to (might still, don’t use it) let you get every page as an RSS feed. Front page, people you follow, individual subreddits.

          Lemmy could do that, I’d really enjoy it.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The problem isn’t the algorithm just because it’s an algorithm, even chronological sort is technically an algoritim.

      The problem is closed source algorithms with no user choice that implement dark patterns and other addictive and psychologically abusive tactics to make users engage with their app as much as possible

    • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I don’t personally have any issue with algorithms - they work quite well for me, though it does require some active management. For example, if I watch one or two 30-second videos on YouTube, it quickly starts recommending more, which quickly floods my feed. However, when I start ignoring those recommendations, despite the temptation to click, the algorithm eventually stops pushing them and shifts back to suggesting accurately tailored, long-form content that genuinely interests me. The same goes for using the “not interested” button. This aligns with my experience on platforms like Twitter and Instagram as well, though the latter I no longer use.

      Algorithms obviously don’t care whether the content they show you makes you glad that you saw it. They simply serve what captures your attention. If it’s outrage, then that’s exactly what you’ll get. The algorithm knows plenty of other users engage with that kind of content, so it rationally assumes the same will apply to you.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        If it’s outrage, then that’s exactly what you’ll get

        I don’t know how fix this, but this is one of the things a good algorithm needs to prevent. Outrage does get my attention - but it isn’t where I want my attention.