• barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I blame Bavaria. If Germany had multiple price zones like other European countries instead of one giant one prices would plummet here in the north, while they’d explode in Bavaria. The state that does not want wind power, does want nuclear power, but already knows ahead of time that its geology (with lots of mountains and granite) is unsuitable for nuclear waste storage. Meanwhile, north German wind power and Scandinavian hydro dams complement each other perfectly. The Bavarians could do the same with the Austrians, they just don’t. They want to eat cake and have it, too.

      • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        Am Bavarian can confirm. The CSU has been in power this state since forever. Especially old people just keep voting for them cause it’s the way it always was. They had to form a coalition after the last elections. Their partner is essentially the exact same party but even more right wing. Not even kidding, I could not name a single area where they differ other than their main guy apparently handed out nazi newspapers in his younger years or smth. He blamed it on his brother and then the scandal just died off.

    • muelltonne@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Those small balcony systems pay for them here in Germany at ~35 Cents/kWh in a few months. Even if your power bill is 7x cheaper, they will pay for themselves easily.

    • Schorsch@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      nb4 someone laughs at us Germans for pulling out of nuclear power: No, nuclear is not cheap. It’s literally the most expensive way to generate electricity. Solar is cheap and better for the environment.

      • troed@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Nuclear is cheaper than your average electricity cost.

        I know because I’m Swedish and you use us as your cheap electricity.

      • 0x0@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        No, nuclear is not cheap. It’s literally the most expensive way to generate electricity

        Source?

        Beats coal anytime. Or Russian gas.

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Nuclear is reliable, predictable and stable 24/7 source. Solar not so much and possibly not that great for the environment if we don’t figure out what to do with used solar panels. Also their production is not exactly clean. Whereas nuclear requires a wasted fuel storage somewhere and the fuel will eventually run out of radiation in some hundreds of thousands years.