• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    There’s no future where this affects me in the slightest. Okay, so jeff Goldblum can get a few more shekels for renting his voice. This doesn’t affect me: that’s his JOB, whether they stole his likeness and paid him, paid him and cloned his voice, or paid him to do the speaking. It’s the same thing, imho.

    Talk to me when people who don’t have their voice recorded get an unfair leg-up for selling it. I’ll be okay with it then, too, but let me know.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 minutes ago

      The real risk is the voice being sold to Disney or Sony Music, and then youtube videos are getting removed because of similarities.

      Voice tones aren’t all that unique in most cases and there’s too much room for abuse imo. The Scarjo and open ai scandal is a good example of this. The voices weren’t that similar and I’m just not interested in having celebrities own whole spectrums like that.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      And it’s a landlord’s job to collect rent. It’s Elon Musk’s job to maximize shareholder value.

      It’s ok if you watch out for numero uno. I’m not expecting more. But you are wrong to think that this doesn’t affect you. You can’t opt out of society. You won’t be able to avoid products with licensed voices. Your taxes will be paying for enforcement against “pirates”. And most importantly, every new privilege for the rich and famous changes society. With every step, the elite becomes more entrenched and the bottom more hopeless. It’s a matter of enlightened self-interest. If we only reject what directly hurts us individually, then the elites will simply build themselves a new feudalism.