• Podunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Truly despicable. Seeding to at least 1 to 1 is the bare minimum of courtesy and humanity. If you dont, its unethical

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Hey now some of us just have wildly shit upload speeds and couldn’t hope to reach 1:1 without spending an entire year seeding a single movie.

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Seeding shouldn’t be done on ratios - being the only one seeding 10 seasons of a tv show and getting it to 0.4:1 is way more helpful than seeding the same movie as everyone else and getting to 20:1, you’re noy contributing anything there other than decreasing your bandwidth for things that aren’t already at 100,000% availability

      • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’d you are the only one seeding it and get to 0.4, you just left others hanging with incomplete downloads.

        However I do agree in general

        • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s what I’m saying

          It’s better to not even half-way seed a torrent with low availability than it is to seed one that everyone else is seeding, regardless of how high your ratio goes - it’s a point on how pointless it really is to waste your resources seeding something like that