• Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Liquidity isn’t a mechanism for facilitating bribes, it’s just isnt.

    I really do not know what more to say here. it is clear to me that you do not understand or rather do not want to understand because you’ve already decided you know.

    This is why I was flippant in my intial responses. I was quite certain you would remained convinced of your own fantasy. It takes very little knowledge of markets to see the flaws in what you want to be true.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Liquidity isn’t a mechanism for facilitating bribes, it’s just isnt.

      I explain how it could be, and all you got in response is ad hominem rhetoric. How about instead of implying you know more than me about markets and what knowledge of them implies, you actually refute the point without phrases like “it just isn’t”?

      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I have refuted the concept that this is a method for bribing. I already did it.

        There is nothing let to discuss.

        You asked me to explain. I did. You completely ignored what I said.

        You didn’t ask for more clarification. You just said you think it’s still possible.

        I’d would be a fool to not see that as a wtf moment.