abhi9u@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · åtta månader sedanPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comexternal-linkmessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up1216arrow-down124cross-posted to: lobsters
arrow-up1192arrow-down1external-linkPython Performance: Why 'if not list' is 2x Faster Than Using len()blog.codingconfessions.comabhi9u@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · åtta månader sedanmessage-square135fedilinkcross-posted to: lobsters
minus-squareriodoro1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·åtta månader sedanThat’s exactly what I was getting at. Getting length of an empty list would not even enter the loop.
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·åtta månader sedanYes. If it’s empty. But in cases where you need to check, it might as well not be.
That’s exactly what I was getting at. Getting length of an empty list would not even enter the loop.
Yes. If it’s empty. But in cases where you need to check, it might as well not be.