• Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    They wouldn’t be human. So much of us is built around our lungs, including our ability to speak that anything adapted to survive without them would be as different from a human as a human is from other lung-less animals. Even if they were more intelligent, they would not look or act remotely like a human.

      • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Okay, first of all, how dare you bring evidence and reason into this.

        On a more serious note, I agree with the position mentioned in the second paragraph that transhumanism results in a posthuman being, that is, a species that is not human.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Human is such a flaky word, and species isn’t much better. I’d bet there could be a situation in which they can successfully interbreed with relatively modern humans and still produce viable offspring, so still the same species. Human doesn’t even require homo sapiens though. It can include other species that have the traits of humans.

          • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            You’re not wrong. One group will displace the other, though. Some of us Homo Sapiens still have genes from Homo Neanderthalensis. Neanderthals aren’t around anymore, though. Also, archeological evidence suggests they didn’t spend much time together.