• filcuk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    They’re a long-term investment. That requires people to plan for the future.

    • SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It also requires your country to have natural resources, otherwise you end up buying the uranium ore from Iran, Russia or Niger

      • pelya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Are you saying the country that created the first ever nuclear bomb does not have uranium deposits?

      • Ptsf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Canada is one of the largest suppliers of uranium for enrichment, like literally #2 or 3 in the world. I feel you left them off your list for… Dubious reasons.

        • SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          The reasons: Illustrative purposes. Yes you can promise to buy local/ only from Democratic States like Canada, or Australia, but purchasing fuel is left to the owner of the plant. If the owner decides Uranium from Russia, Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan (or via some other non santioned country) is better/ cheaper, there is little to nothing stopping them from doing so.

          I’m aware Canada and Australia are among the top 10 producers/reserve-havers.

          My point: it’s a different matter for non Uranium- having Countries in the world. Same with Rare Earths and Battery tech or using Russian ahem Indian gas in Europe, but that is maybe a different conversation.