That’s all. I just found this in a random script. Generates a random UUID every time it’s called. I didn’t know.

Of course I can also use uuidgen or pipe /dev/(u)random into something to get a random alphanumeric string - but this is built right into the kernel!

In /proc/sys/kernel/random/, there’s also boot_id which seems to do the same is static, and some tweakable parameters.

❤️🐧

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The most secure Bitcoin endpoint yet!

        lol.

        Okay, let’s be honest, it’s basically a crappy Pentium 4 box with Debian and nginx installed.

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        while :; do cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid > /dev/null; done

        edit: on all cores for maximum “efficiency”

      • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Would have to be cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid > /dev/null

        You can’t pipe to a file, only to programs, and since /dev/null isn’t an executable your command will simply give an error.

        To make it more clear, consider using dd, which lets you explicitly specify an input and output file. For example: dd if=/proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid of=/dev/sda1 wait shit that wasn’t the right output oh god oh fu

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The information will be evenly distributed upon its surface and some believe one day it will be be radiated back out into the rest of the system.

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That reminds me of the CPU stress test I ran many years ago.

        dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/null

        If you have 8 cores, just open 8 terminals, and run that code in each of them.

          • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Absolutely not, quite the opposite actually. However, the end result is close to 100% CPU load, which is good enough for some purposes. Let’s say you want to test the performance of your CPU cooler, or overclock stability, this should good enough. There are also dedicated tools for people with more advanced needs.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago
          for i in {1..n}  # where n == number of cores
          do
            dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null &
          done
          
          # to stop:
          jobs -p | xargs kill
          
            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              the advantage of yours is that you can actually see the performance number afterwards.