• ikt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    But most people will never see one, nor do they care to see one

    then who cares?

    this is like being sad people don’t care for Marionette shows anymore

    • ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Fucking hell. I… really gave you too much credit, huh? “Who cares that the only films average people will see are AI trash?” Like, if you don’t get the problem here, I really don’t think I can explain it.

      • ikt@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Like, if you don’t get the problem here, I really don’t think I can explain it.

        tbh I might need AI to explain it to me because to me you just said: people like trash

        hence the success of a lot of the Marvel films despite rapid decreases in quality, or the Star Wars sequels.

        The part I don’t get is, what difference does it make (to you) if the trash is made by a guy using AI or made by a company?

        The main thing is that quality movie cinema goers like yourself have an organic free range no ai involved movie experience, and so long as there is enough of you out there (and there should be) then you’ll be able to enjoy your cinematography experiences while the rest of us watch slop (and ultimately isn’t this what is currently happening anyway?)

        Not only that but are you assuming that AI and computational power will never reach a point where we’ll be able to create a wide variety of films and movies that are on par with or exceed today’s movies?

        Are we assuming there will never be a movie that’s made using AI that is better than these:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_considered_the_worst

        or the garbage that’s on TV at 3 in the morning?