Kairos@lemmy.today to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agotop 5 unsolved problems in computer sciencelemmy.todayimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1354arrow-down19file-textcross-posted to: microblogmemes@lemmy.world
arrow-up1345arrow-down1imagetop 5 unsolved problems in computer sciencelemmy.todayKairos@lemmy.today to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agomessage-square56fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: microblogmemes@lemmy.world
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agothis is not a defined thing in markdown, just the markdown renderers of some clients do it
minus-squaresquaresinger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoThis here is apparently the original source of the markdown specification, and there it clearly says that this is the correct behaviour: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#list Ordered lists use numbers followed by periods: Bird McHale Parish It’s important to note that the actual numbers you use to mark the list have no effect on the HTML output Markdown produces. The > HTML Markdown produces from the above list is: <ol> <li>Bird</li> <li>McHale</li> <li>Parish</li> </ol> If you instead wrote the list in Markdown like this: Bird McHale Parish or even: Bird McHale Parish you’d get the exact same HTML output
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agohmm, you are right. it’s not actually a bug in the renderer then
minus-squaresquaresinger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 day agoThe only difference to the standard that I see is that the standard says it should be 1,2,3,4,5, while at least for me it renders as 5,6,7,8,9. But that’s probably because it doesn’t render as HTML and thus doesn’t rely on HTML to do the numbering.
this is not a defined thing in markdown, just the markdown renderers of some clients do it
This here is apparently the original source of the markdown specification, and there it clearly says that this is the correct behaviour: https://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#list
hmm, you are right. it’s not actually a bug in the renderer then
The only difference to the standard that I see is that the standard says it should be 1,2,3,4,5, while at least for me it renders as 5,6,7,8,9.
But that’s probably because it doesn’t render as HTML and thus doesn’t rely on HTML to do the numbering.