They were bought by IBM a few years back, but even aside from that they’re a corporation and they care about making money above all else.

It looks like Red Hat is doing its damnedest to consolidate as much power for themselves within the Linux ecosystem.

I don’t think the incessant Fedora shilling is unrelated.

It seems like there isn’t much criticism of the company or their tactics, and I’m curious if any of you think that should change.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Rock Linux isn’t “stealing” anything. They make a exact RHEL clone for those who want absolute RHEL clone. Almalinux on the other hand is just trying to be comparable with RHEL software and tools. It is very similar to RHEL but they do things like fix issues faster. Some people are weary of Almalinux because it is tied to cloudlinux.

    • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No, it is “stealing.” Even worse is that they don’t contribute back to the community. They’re breaking the terms and agreement in order to get the source. Alma is based on CentOS Stream and is ABI compatible with RHEL.

          • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I agree, but they’ve also made deliberate moves to muddy the waters of open source and push the limits of what is acceptable under GPL, and I’m not going to shed any tears over their loss of potential corporate profit.