pandasiusfilet@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoAI search finds publishers starved of referral trafficwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1129arrow-down16cross-posted to: hackernews
arrow-up1123arrow-down1external-linkAI search finds publishers starved of referral trafficwww.theregister.compandasiusfilet@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square37fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down5·21 hours agoAI literally produces better answers than 99% of ad supported, SEOptimized websites. That’s saying not a lot about AI though. It tells you how utterly awful searching the web is thanks to those sites.
minus-squarepulsewidth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·21 hours agoI’d say AI search summaries are somewhat useful for me 30% of the time. And I click through to the sources to confirm its summaries anyway, because they’re often oversimplified. Often though, they’re goddamn useless.
AI literally produces better answers than 99% of ad supported, SEOptimized websites.
That’s saying not a lot about AI though. It tells you how utterly awful searching the web is thanks to those sites.
I’d say AI search summaries are somewhat useful for me 30% of the time. And I click through to the sources to confirm its summaries anyway, because they’re often oversimplified.
Often though, they’re goddamn useless.