This is a truly WTF moment about messed up responses to X11 session removal in Gnome.
2 weeks ago I published a blogpost about the upcoming plans of GNOME 49 and the eventual removal of the X11 session. Since then, instead of looking at feedback, bugs and issues related to the topic, we all collectively had to deal with the following, and I am not exaggerating one bit:
- Fascists and Nazis
- Wild Conspiracy Theories that make Qanon jealous
- “Concerned” Trolling about the Accessibility of the Wayland session
- A culture war where Wayland is Gay, and X11 is the glorious past they stole from you
In my wildest dreams I could have never made this shit up. You all need mandatory supervised access to the Internet from now on.
If you mean the way a medieval village or town functioned, then this comparison omits the improvements of “capitalism” over it.
Person make chair, person sell chair, person eat - that’s if they are this village’s or town’s chairmaker. If not, they are treated as if they stole from the chairmaker. Teeth kicked in, banished. Something like that. The chairmaker’s role is transferred by inheritance or by apprenticeship from one person to one other person. Like a noble’s title.
The way medical practice works in some countries with English law, I’ve heard, still reminisces that, and the results are not liked generally.
Choices and social mobility and social lifts are not present in a traditional society. That village remains in one place over many years. It may grow or shrink, but there’s simply no need to allow cook’s son to become a chairmaker, or vice versa. Or if there’s is, the whole village may assemble and talk about such a decision once in 10-20 years. If he has two sons, then one of them works for the other, can’t be cook on his own. If he wants to be his own man, he can try and find an apprenticeship, if some other master doesn’t have a son or an apprentice. In other place maybe.
In a city it was similar, except, to scale the same “natural order”, guilds existed and not small families, but guilds’ heads would make such collegial decisions. Or heads of merchant families.
What you feel as oppression now is not really worse than what a medieval man felt, living all his life the same way in the same place.
I blame Marx for this misconception, he probably tried to play the “good old times” typical German card, but his followers, as a result, often believe that industrialization somehow made free people wage slaves. No. Try living in a village, today, in a western country. And then imagine you wouldn’t work or travel elsewhere, all your life would be around that small place, with the same few people and families year after year. Social lifts and social mobility, vertical or even horizontal, were simply unimaginable in such a structure.