• /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yep same here. Also they’re not capable of installing grapheneos which is kind of a deal breaker for me.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The GrapheneOS team makes their hardware security requirments very clear.

        Its up to the hardware manufactures to include a few additional components used for securely storing keys, so far Google Pixles are the only consistent line of products that do so.

        • Logi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          So… they chose to make a very Pixel-specific OS and you’re mad at Fairphone?

          • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            It’s not about being pixel specific. They built high security OS that uses HW components to deliver that high security. It can’t be delivered without them. These components are not google patented nor does GrapheneOS demands they use the exact pixel ones. GrapheneOS just refuses to lower security to support phones that lack these components, because manufacturers wanted to save maybe a $1 per phone by not including them at the cost of user security.