• zedgeist@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    That 205C would just be the surface temperature of the chicken, not the average. Note that the calculation doesn’t take into account the volume or radius

    EDIT: No, I’m wrong. The calculation is for boiling the whole chicken. Who was this written by, a Brit?

    • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Who was this written by, a Brit?

      Nope. Likely an American.

      When cooking, people in general like to use round numbers, like “200°C”, since a difference of 5°C in oven temperature is not a big deal.

      And yet they went with some oddly specific 205°C. That only makes sense if they’re used to Fahrenheit, eyeballed a round value (like 400°F), converted it into Celsius (204.4°C), and then rounded it up to discard the decimal.

      I’m also going to say they’re completely clueless when it comes to cooking - 200°C is the oven temperature. The chicken itself reaches a far lower temperature, in the 70~80°C range. By the time the chicken reached 200°C, it’s already dry and close to catching fire. (The self-ignition temperature for biological stuff is typically between 200°C and 250°C.)

    • laserwash2000@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Are you sure? The numbers in the tweet reddit post talk about total mass and heat capacity. So I think that means the entire bulk has that average temperature.