• SMillerNL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        This is IOS only owing to Android play store collecting a device identifier; the creator wanted complete anonymity

        Quote from some other place people were discussing it. Unfortunately no source on it.

          • SirQuack@feddit.nl
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            It’s not about the store, it’s about the notification.

            As mentioned in the Time article:

            the app is not available on Android because it “requires a device ID in order to send push notifications, which requires a user account and a password.”

          • SMillerNL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Thanks, but I’m not the developer of the app so that’s not really relevant for me.

            • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              12 hours ago

              i don’t think this other commenter was calling you out. i think they were just bringing up a point of discussion that’s relevant to the point you brought up

              • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                It has to do with receiving notifications from the app in a privacy-preserving way. Unless the app is running with a server connection 24/7 (RIP battery life) you need to rely on the OS to deliver notifications.

                • Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  You don’t, there’s privacy respecting ways of delivering notifications in android.

                  Also, a 24/7 connection to a server isn’t nearly as bad as you might think.

                  The connection isn’t active the whole time, it only uses any significant amount of battery if there’s actually data being sent or received. You likely already have quite a few of them anyway, how do you think systems normally listen for push notifications?

                  Besides all that, I read in other comments that the privacy issue was the device id firebase needs. Obviously apple also needs some kind of device id, otherwise how do they know where the notifications are going?

                  Did some searching, yup apple also needs a unique identifier:

                  When it’s time to send a notification, you generate a request that contains the notification data and a unique identifier for the user’s device.

                  From https://developer.apple.com/documentation/usernotifications/setting-up-a-remote-notification-server