• jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’m not claiming that the use of AI is ethical. If you want to fight back you have to take it seriously though.

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It cant do 30% of tasks vorrectly. It can do tasks correctly as much as 30% of the time, and since it’s llm shit you know those numbers have been more massaged than any human in history has ever been.

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I meant the latter, not “it can do 30% of tasks correctly 100% of the time.”

            • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Tjose are people who could be living their li:es, pursuing their ambitions, whatever. That could get some shit done. Comparison not valid.

              • Honytawk@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                6 hours ago

                The comparison is about the correctness of their work.

                Their lives have nothing to do with it.

                • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  46 minutes ago

                  So, first, bad comparison.

                  Second: if that’s the equivalent, why not do the one that makes tge wealthy let a few pennies go to fall on actual people?

                • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Human lives are the most important thing of all. Profits are irrelevant compared to human lives. I get that that’s not how Besos sees the world, but he’s a monstrous outlier.

          • jsomae@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            yes, that’s generally useless. It should not be shoved down people’s throats. 30% accuracy still has its uses, especially if the result can be programmatically verified.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Run something with a 70% failure rate 10x and you get to a cumulative 98% pass rate. LLMs don’t get tired and they can be run in parallel.

              • jsomae@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                The problem is they are not i.i.d., so this doesn’t really work. It works a bit, which is in my opinion why chain-of-thought is effective (it gives the LLM a chance to posit a couple answers first). However, we’re already looking at “agents,” so they’re probably already doing chain-of-thought.

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  38 minutes ago

                  Very fair comment. In my experience even increasing the temperature you get stuck in local minimums

                  I was just trying to illustrate how 70% failure rates can still be useful.

              • MangoCats@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I have actually been doing this lately: iteratively prompting AI to write software and fix its errors until something useful comes out. It’s a lot like machine translation. I speak fluent C++, but I don’t speak Rust, but I can hammer away on the AI (with English language prompts) until it produces passable Rust for something I could write for myself in C++ in half the time and effort.

                I also don’t speak Finnish, but Google Translate can take what I say in English and put it into at least somewhat comprehensible Finnish without egregious translation errors most of the time.

                Is this useful? When C++ is getting banned for “security concerns” and Rust is the required language, it’s at least a little helpful.

                • jsomae@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  I’m impressed you can make strides with Rust with AI. I am in a similar boat, except I’ve found LLMs are terrible with Rust.

                  • MangoCats@feddit.it
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    I was 0/6 on various trials of AI for Rust over the past 6 months, then I caught a success. Turns out, I was asking it to use a difficult library - I can’t make the thing I want work in that library either (library docs say it’s possible, but…) when I posed a more open ended request without specifying the library to use, it succeeded - after a fashion. It will give you code with cargo build errors, I copy-paste the error back to it like “address: <pasted error message>” and a bit more than half of the time it is able to respond with a working fix.

              • jsomae@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Are you just trolling or do you seriously not understand how something which can do a task correctly with 30% reliability can be made useful if the result can be automatically verified.

                • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  19 hours ago

                  Its not a magical 30%, factors apply. It’s not even a mind that thinks and just isnt very good.

                  This isnt like a magical dice that gives you truth on a 5 or a 6, and lies on 1,2,3,7, and for.

                  This is a (very complicated very large) language or other data graph that programmatically identifies an average. 30% of the time-according to one potempkin-ass demonstration. Which means the more possible that is, the easier it is to either use a simpler cheaper tool that will give you a better more reliable answer much faster.

                  And 20 tons of human shit has uses! If you know its providence, there’s all sorts of population level public health surveillance you can do to get ahead of disease trends! Its also got some good agricultural stuff in it-phosphorous and stuff, if you can extract it.

                  Stop. Just please fucking stop glazing these NERVE-ass fascist shit-goblins.

                  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    I think everyone in the universe is aware of how LLMs work by now, you don’t need to explain it to someone just because they think LLMs are more useful than you do.

                    IDK what you mean by glazing but if by “glaze” you mean “understanding the potential threat of AI to society instead of hiding under a rock and pretending it’s as useless as a plastic radio,” then no, I won’t stop.