• Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The name Harkonnen (though Finnish) was chosen because it sounds Russian. However, no, it isn’t really a US VS Soviet story. It’s about systems. It’s about ecology, power, and freedom. If you only read Dune then I can see how you could think that, but the other books give you a lot more information.

    Arrakis is terraformed, and this disrupts the ecosystem of Shai-hulud, which destroys spice production. It also destroys Fremen culture, with people teaching what the Fremen were like, but not really knowing.

    Paul and, to an even further extent, Lato II are aggressive dictators. They destroys people’s freedom, with the end goal to create people who can’t be predicted who rebel, because that’s the only way (that they can see) to guarantee freedom for humanity.

    I addition to this, the Harkonnen are really just there as a subversion. Paul’s grandfather, as he learns in Dune, is the Baron Harkonnen, so he is a Harkonnen. This really destroys any message about it being one side VS the other.

    It’s about systems. Paul was systematically bread. The Harkonnen and Atreides were used by the emperial system to maintain control and order (although this failed). The system of ecology keeps Arrakis in balance, and the people live in harmony with it. Systems of control prevent people from being free.

    • Transtronaut@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That was an interesting analysis, thanks! I feel it also reinforces my original observation. The East India Company was nothing, if not a system of control that ultimately failed.