• carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why can’t we just have fewer people too? Instead of finding ways to support 50 billion people, how about we have good birth control facilities, education, and economies not based on constant never ending growth? The reality is unending growth WILL end whether people like it or not- wouldn’t it be better to do it on our own terms rather than in a global catastrophe?

    • DreamButt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The best way to control population growth is to actually give them a high standard of living and education. One of the most consistent trends in a developing nation is it’s birth rate slowing down as people become more prosperous

    • yogurtwrong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why can’t we just have fewer people too?

      Won’t somebody think of the ECONOMY?

      A lot of countries around the world are living a so called “underpopulation crisis” even though the population is still growing frighteningly fast. Population going down is only a problem for capitalism, and it’s going to doom us all

    • Shareni@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      wouldn’t it be better to do it on our own terms rather than in a global catastrophe?

      The catastrophy is inevitable, it’s just a question of whether any humans will survive.

      For example CO2 has a delayed effect of ~40years (if I remember correctly). The effects of global warming are very much obvious now, but the yearly output hasn’t at any point dropped to those levels since.

    • Eq0@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most of the world is far from replacement levels of population and the global trend is a decrease in fertility. Overall, we are at 2.4 kids per woman, the replacement level being estimated between 2.1 and 2.3 (depending how likely you think it is to die from wars). This data has been (mostly) decreasing since the 60s.