• REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    And bunch of other sacrifices. One of the points was also about everyone living in a city close by. The study is not applicable to real life, it’s utopia scenario. One of the biggest problems isn’t even resources, but co2 production.

    • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I dunno, I think it would be perfectly doable with good public transit.

      Don’t have many big cities, but have mid-sized cities near-ish, and smaller towns near the mid-sized ones. A sort of ‘web’ of cities, if you will.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        what you’re describing is called “multigrid” system.

        you have grids of varying size, all overlapping each other.

        examples:

        notice the streets make some kind of “grid” on the landscape

            • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s awesome, thanks!

              And honestly, I could see this sort of systems being handy - having raillines between the big and mid-sized cities, and bus services for the aforementioned + small cities and towns, and (electric) bicycles for the rest.