• BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s fair. My take was shallow and I was thinking more from personal experience. I’m ~200lbs and burn over 100 kcal every mile I run, and am a distance athlete. If I jog 6 miles or bike 20+, I have to replace that for proper recovery.

    I shouldn’t say most people, but a large amount of people need more than 2100 kcal if they are active.

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s honestly wild the difference in caloric requirements based on age and sex/gender (I don’t know how much is due to size/hormones, so I don’t know where trans people’s requirements would be) even before factoring in activity level, so it’s entirely reasonable not to realize the difference.

      • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        For trans people it depends.

        If you’re just starting estrogen-oriented HRT and you’re at a weight considered ideal for your pre-HRT body, then it is helpful to actually gain a few kg of fat, together with weekly bursts of activity. Then fat redistribution will be more effectively towards a )( body shape, with breast growth improved.

        For testosterone-oriented HRT, I’m less certain, though I assume the same applies, though with the accent more on weight loss and exercise for muscle growth.

        That said, everyone has their own goals; important is that one remains healthy. A body fat percent healthy for all people (binary and nonbinary) would be around 14-25%. If you can get pregnant (and seek to do so), it’s better to be a little higher in this range.