Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agoSweden prime minister under fire after admitting that he regularly consults AI tools for a second opinionwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up1419arrow-down14cross-posted to: hackernewseurope@feddit.org
arrow-up1415arrow-down1external-linkSweden prime minister under fire after admitting that he regularly consults AI tools for a second opinionwww.theguardian.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square130fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernewseurope@feddit.org
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 days agothere absolutely is something wrong with sending the basis for decisions in matters of state to a foreign actor, though.
minus-squareBeacon@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·2 days agoAs i wrote in another comment, you can run a local instance of chatgpt or other ai on your own computer, no internet involved
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoof course you can. why would a career politician who has very visibly been interested only in politics since his teens know how to do that?
minus-squareBeacon@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoHah, true. But the point still stands that using an llm itself wasn’t a bad thing
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 days agoi’d say it’s still bad because this is the leader of a government consulting with a stochastic parrot instead of experts.
minus-squareBeacon@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoPresumably it wasn’t instead of, it was in addition to, and therefore totally fine
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoit’s still not fine, as per my first point. it’s leaking information to foreign interests.
minus-squareBeacon@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·2 days agoRight, but we already addressed that above. If it’s done on a local pc’s ai that doesn’t operate using a net connection, and is used in addition to rather than instead of consulting with people, then it’s totally fine
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoyeah but then we’re no longer discussing the topic the thread is about.
there absolutely is something wrong with sending the basis for decisions in matters of state to a foreign actor, though.
As i wrote in another comment, you can run a local instance of chatgpt or other ai on your own computer, no internet involved
of course you can. why would a career politician who has very visibly been interested only in politics since his teens know how to do that?
Hah, true. But the point still stands that using an llm itself wasn’t a bad thing
i’d say it’s still bad because this is the leader of a government consulting with a stochastic parrot instead of experts.
Presumably it wasn’t instead of, it was in addition to, and therefore totally fine
it’s still not fine, as per my first point. it’s leaking information to foreign interests.
Right, but we already addressed that above. If it’s done on a local pc’s ai that doesn’t operate using a net connection, and is used in addition to rather than instead of consulting with people, then it’s totally fine
yeah but then we’re no longer discussing the topic the thread is about.