• pdxfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a step. Why wouldn’t they default to not accepting any AI generated content, and maybe have a manual approval process? It would both protect the content and discourage LLM uses where llms suck.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why wouldn’t they default to not accepting any AI generated content

      If you can accurately detect what content is AI generated, you’ll have a company worth billions overnight

    • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Manual approval process would kill the site I think, there’s just so much content on it that gets updated constantly it would just grind it all to a halt

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Right, and by manual approval it just would be the absolute lowest priority. Kind of like the automated message “we’re expecting higher than normal call volumes” as companies gently tell us their margins are more important than their customers.