I think “creating a popular kernel” is significantly downplaying his creation. Almost all of the web runs on the Linux kernel and I don’t mean just web servers but also DNS servers and routers. Every android phone uses Linux. Most embedded devices run Linux. Anything “smart” is likely to run on Linux. If your car has anything resembling an operating system it’s probably running Linux.
He didn’t create a popular kernel, he created a kernel that runs the world you live in.
He’s definitely done a huge amount of work and been very successful… But if he hadn’t there’s a strong chance someone else would have. So it’s not like without Torvalds the web would all be running on Windows. We’d probably be using FreeBSD or something.
Or maybe Plan 9! Who knows, we might have ended up in a better state. Or worse. I doubt we wouldn’t have anything though. There are too many nerds who like writing OSes for fun.
If you want to look in the operating system space, Linux holds the highest share of operating systems that aren’t Windows or MacOS. And that share is maybe 3% if you isolate it to just PC gamers, and much lower when you include general computer usage.
Could one of the BSD variants have ended up in the same position? Maybe, but probably not. Linux is basically a unicorn where circumstances lined up perfectly for it to become as big as it is today.
As much as it sucks to admit, the Linux kernel would not be where it is today without the additional expertise and man-hours donated by companies. That never would have happened if it weren’t open-source, collaborative, and free for commercial use. It also happened to exist in a situation where the cost-benefit analysis meant it was more worthwhile to hire people to improve the Linux kernel, than it would have been to create a kernel in-house or license one from a vendor.
As much as it sucks to admit, the Linux kernel would not be where it is today without the additional expertise and man-hours donated by companies. That never would have happened if it weren’t open-source, collaborative, and free for commercial use.
It feels like you’re ignoring network effects here. If Linux didn’t exist then something else (e.g. FreeBSD) would be much more popular and would be targeted by companies instead.
I think “creating a popular kernel” is significantly downplaying his creation. Almost all of the web runs on the Linux kernel and I don’t mean just web servers but also DNS servers and routers. Every android phone uses Linux. Most embedded devices run Linux. Anything “smart” is likely to run on Linux. If your car has anything resembling an operating system it’s probably running Linux.
He didn’t create a popular kernel, he created a kernel that runs the world you live in.
He’s definitely done a huge amount of work and been very successful… But if he hadn’t there’s a strong chance someone else would have. So it’s not like without Torvalds the web would all be running on Windows. We’d probably be using FreeBSD or something.
Or maybe Plan 9! Who knows, we might have ended up in a better state. Or worse. I doubt we wouldn’t have anything though. There are too many nerds who like writing OSes for fun.
This is a terrible take. If Linus didn’t exist, open source would be light years behind its current scope.
There are many sectors that have been completely captured by the “bad guys”. Luckily, operating systems aren’t one of them.
How do you know?
If you want to look in the operating system space, Linux holds the highest share of operating systems that aren’t Windows or MacOS. And that share is maybe 3% if you isolate it to just PC gamers, and much lower when you include general computer usage.
Could one of the BSD variants have ended up in the same position? Maybe, but probably not. Linux is basically a unicorn where circumstances lined up perfectly for it to become as big as it is today.
As much as it sucks to admit, the Linux kernel would not be where it is today without the additional expertise and man-hours donated by companies. That never would have happened if it weren’t open-source, collaborative, and free for commercial use. It also happened to exist in a situation where the cost-benefit analysis meant it was more worthwhile to hire people to improve the Linux kernel, than it would have been to create a kernel in-house or license one from a vendor.
Why not?
It feels like you’re ignoring network effects here. If Linux didn’t exist then something else (e.g. FreeBSD) would be much more popular and would be targeted by companies instead.