• NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Well, we took a ton of half measures and performed a lot of safety theater. Big shocker, it didn’t work well. Either way, the point wasn’t to stop the disease entirely, but spread out the cases to “flatten the curve” and reduce load on hospitals, which it did do.

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      No, it didnt work at all. We literally knew lockdowns didnt work in spring of 2020, it was all a steaming pile of bullshit including flattening the curve.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Strange, because the countries where they did implement those measures came out better than the ones that didn’t.

        I’m sorry, but you can’t argue with history.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Apples and oranges. There was a study in spring of 2020 by JP morgan chase that showed the exact thing that anyone that was looking at the data would see, the lockdowns did absolutely nothing. Literally nothing.

          • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Man, a massive corporation whose bottom line would be hugely impacted from a proper lock down said a proper lockdown wouldn’t work? That’s craaaaaaaaazy 🙄