fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoReal Talkmander.xyzimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1498arrow-down11
arrow-up1497arrow-down1imageReal Talkmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareMicrow@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·2 days agoWorst case scenario: The peer reviewer is Gabor.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·2 days agoBest Case Scenario: Gabor agrees the paper was crap
minus-squareMaturin [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoYour comment combined with Zote’s made for an excellent synthesis.
minus-squareZoteTheMighty@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 days agoIf your reviewer suggests you cite another paper, it’s one of their papers and they just doxed themselves, 100% of the time.
Worst case scenario:
The peer reviewer is Gabor.
Best Case Scenario:
Gabor agrees the paper was crap
Your comment combined with Zote’s made for an excellent synthesis.
If your reviewer suggests you cite another paper, it’s one of their papers and they just doxed themselves, 100% of the time.