Starting next year, Google will begin to verify the identities of developers distributing their apps on Android devices, not just those who distribute via the Play Store.

    • jcs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      38 minutes ago

      There are alternatives to Google and Apple products. I recommend the MNT Pocket Reform if you’d like a full keyboard, or a Librem 5 if you prefer a more typical smartphone form factor.

  • RealM__@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    58 minutes ago

    goddamnit I JUST bought a new Fairphone 5 and opted not to go for e/os variant, because I was worried of incompatibility issues.

    Guess I’ll have to learn how to replace my phone OS in 2026…

  • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Will, what’s the point now? Fuck it get an Apple. Why not.

    EDIT This is the future. Stop sideloading apps, then lock the bootloader.

    • LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Right now? Yeah, its very easy to do, and there’s a download link for it included in GrapheneOS’s preinstalled app-store.

      I am however worried that eventually Google will make running custom software (apks, alternate firmwares) so difficult that development for those will stop long term.

    • festus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Mostly; they just force themselves into the process for publishing each app and have an effective veto on apps. So yeah, no stores fully independent of Google.

  • Balldowern@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    So I guess my next phone will be a Chinese phone. Even if it spies on me, I’ll have the freedom to install whatever I want from anywhere.

    The Chinese have a golden window of opportunity. Let’s hope they don’t mess this up.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It really is past time we saw serious work on a mobile flavor of Linux. Not AOSP, not anything whatsoever downstream of Google, but a regular Linux distro with a mobile friendly DTE.

    • Xatolos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      No, it’s nothing like what Apple’s been doing.

      Apple has been losing in court about everyone needs to give them money anytime anything makes any money on iOS, or even thinking absolutely allowing others to install anything beyond their App Store.

      This is Google demanding every app that can be installed on Android must be signed by them, and the only cost is registering with them your name and address, possibly verified by government ID. (And quite possible doxxing you at the same time as they already do on the Play Store…)

      These are very different, and unlike Apple, will more likely be applauded by numerous world governments in the current “anything a child can even remotely even know about” must have its users be checked to make sure they are “allowed to”.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The closer google gets to apple, the more similar they become. Except apples shit generally all works well together. Knock off air tags, chromecast, audio groups, and so many other things are riddled with bugs and never fixed.

      If you make android the same as iOS, I might as well switch.

        • Mihies@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          The only way to fake it would be to use a “public” signature, but then again, I’m sure google will revoke them eventually. I guess rooting won’t be enough, one would have to change some internal binaries. Perhaps it’s time for a ungooglified android OS 🤷‍♂️

        • Mihies@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Torrent client is just an application, author shouldn’t be responsible - naive thinking I suppose

            • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Right sorry. I thought you meant developers won’t sign them. Obviously you mean Google.

              I hope Google at least will only sign identities, e.g. you really are DeathByBigSad and this is your key which you can sign apps with. Not look at the apps themselves. That may be too much to hope for. :(

      • Integrate777@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Can Nintendo request Google revoke authorization for emulator developers? Or publishers requesting revoking any of the hugely popular manga aggregator apps. Or maybe they’ll just outright refuse them from the start, like they will with revanced.

        • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          none of those apps would receive authorization in this scenario. you would not be able to use them

        • Mihies@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’m on your side and you are correct, besides Google amassing a ton of money (each registration costs $25) they will have total control and we know that Google is far beyond “not evil”.

        • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          What’s extra funny is that I already did all of this, and yet, I’ve been informed that my developer account is subject to deletion because I’m not active enough. Since my game does not get regular updates I said F this, let them delete my account. It’s still available for sideload on itch.io anyway. Jokes on me for believing that.

          So yeah, it seems like Google is actively hostile towards building a library of software/games that just work and intentionally only wants live service garbage apps on their platform because those make more revenue.