TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoBig Surprise—Nobody Wants 8K TVswww.howtogeek.comexternal-linkmessage-square375fedilinkarrow-up1554arrow-down110
arrow-up1544arrow-down1external-linkBig Surprise—Nobody Wants 8K TVswww.howtogeek.comTheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square375fedilink
minus-squareGeometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·2 months agoYep, just imagine how bad the compression artefacts will be if they double the resolution but keep storage/network costs the same.
minus-squareTyphoon@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·2 months agoDoubling the dimensions make it 4x the data.
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoThat’s not true for compressed video. It doubles the bitrate for the same quality on modern codecs (265, av1, etc.)
minus-squareIhaveCrabs111@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoNot if you only double it in one direction. Checkmate.
minus-squareAnivia@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-22 months agoIncreasing resolution but keeping the same bitrate still improves the image quality, unless the bitrate was extremely low in the first place. Especially with modern codecs 20mbps 4k looks a lot better than 20mbps 1080p with AV1
Yep, just imagine how bad the compression artefacts will be if they double the resolution but keep storage/network costs the same.
Doubling the dimensions make it 4x the data.
That’s not true for compressed video. It doubles the bitrate for the same quality on modern codecs (265, av1, etc.)
Not if you only double it in one direction. Checkmate.
Increasing resolution but keeping the same bitrate still improves the image quality, unless the bitrate was extremely low in the first place. Especially with modern codecs
20mbps 4k looks a lot better than 20mbps 1080p with AV1