• wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, much like how brontosaurus was later discovered to be a mix of bones from various individuals, “Distanceraptor” is actually a conflation of multiple Displacemosaurids.

      • ellohir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sorry to break these news to you but in 2015 they discovered that Brontosaurus actually existed, so the “it was a mix of other species bones” is wrong, as much as a fun fact it was 😟

        • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Thanks for the fascinating read! It seems like the specific taxonomy is still far from certain and needs validation, by the study authors’ own admission, but you’re absolutely correct that it wasn’t the bones of multiple species! I could swear there was another one of those from Germany that was a mishmash. Do you remember what that one was? I’m just a geochemist, not a palaeontologist. But anyway, I look forward to seeing validation studies by others of the 2015 findings! It would be great to see all of that hard work pay off! Do you know of any? I wasn’t able to find any from a cursory glance around the internet.

          • ellohir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            No, sorry, I just remembered the rebuttal of the fun fact, but I’m not into paleontology so I don’t know about the rest.