Neat breakdown with data + some code.

  • edent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    (OP here) Sorry mate, are you accusing me of being in the pocket of Big Oil? Here’s everything I’ve written about solar over the last decade - https://shkspr.mobi/blog/tag/solar/ - feel free to point out where I’ve said “yay fossil fuels!”

    I didn’t include AC because that’s not a thing in the UK.

    Oh, and I don’t use electricity for primary heating. Solar thermal is pretty useless in my part of the world because you don’t need much hot water in summer (mmmm! Cold showers!)

    As I said in my post, this is a purely theoretical discussion about what future technology might look like. Your argument is like someone from 2001 going “a recordable CD can hold 650MB - so you only need two for a really long car trip. There’s no way people in the future will have 1TB hard drives! For anything else, just use AM radio.”

    Basically, one of us is braindead - and I’m not so sure it is me!

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Ok, to be polite, you were just mistaken in portraying a 1 mwh battery as a reasonable idea. It is just so absurdly stupid that motives for the proposal need to be looked at. I accept your admission of stupid instead of evil.

      • edent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m sorry you didn’t read my article. If you had, you would have seen me say…

        Remember, this is just a bit of fun. There’s no practical way to build domestic batteries with this capacity using the technology of 2025.

        And

        Is this sensible? Probably not, no.

        And

        remember, this is an exercise in wishful thinking.

        At no point did I say it was a reasonable idea. I went out of my way to demonstrate how impractical it was.

        I accept your admission that you didn’t read my post means you are stupid rather than evil etc.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          But there are sensible paths to going off grid. Why you would write about an impractical fantasy path was my puzzlement.

          • edent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            60 minutes ago

            There’s this thing that writers do called “thought experiments”. It is a form of intellectual exercise to examine what happens at extremes.

            It helps us explore an idea by future gazing and, yes, getting a little ridiculous. Imagine someone in 1975 saying “what would the world be like if we all had Gbps Internet?”

            There was nothing of that speed available for domestic use, but thinking about an “impractical” technology means they can ask “would video conferencing disrupt the travel industry?”

            That’s what I’m doing. 25 years ago home solar was too expensive to be practical. 25 years ago having a 5kWh battery in your home was close to impossible.

            In 25 years time will batteries be cheap enough for us each to have a MWh in the loft? I reckon so. What does the world look like when every home has the ability to be energy self-sufficient using solar?