Hilarious that a big name website would implement minimum image sizes, but a very valid use case then. Cause nothing is more frustrating than having your upload being rejected for some arbitrary size limitation that doesn’t match between sites
Technically? I work on document viewers and there are times I need to inspect rendering times for “large files.” Being able to produce files of arbitrary size is beneficial for troubleshooting, but falls short of actual customer docs.
But why?
Article states some websites like LinkedIn, government websites have a minimum requirement on image size. Say 50kb for linkedin pfp
Hilarious that a big name website would implement minimum image sizes, but a very valid use case then. Cause nothing is more frustrating than having your upload being rejected for some arbitrary size limitation that doesn’t match between sites
Charitably? Upscale a thumbnail.
Practically? Almost no reason.
Technically? I work on document viewers and there are times I need to inspect rendering times for “large files.” Being able to produce files of arbitrary size is beneficial for troubleshooting, but falls short of actual customer docs.
Website suggests HadBomb… Not sure what that is
So you can do dumb shit like make a tiny 100mb file