• Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I just had a moment of what is everything

    I don’t know how to explain it but from nothing to something to nothing again but no why

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Its the whole “why is there anything at all” thing for me. Like why is there any energy to have made all of this. Couldn’t there just have never been anything at all? Nothing for anyone to experience. Its so hard to perceive and think about but its absolutely fascinating.

    • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The ‘why’ is us.

      Without consciousness in the universe, there might as well not be a universe.

      • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Not having consciousness might be the best thing that could happen to a universe. Just everything existing, without desire or suffering.

        With a universe that peaceful, there might as well not be us.

        • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          What would be the point of a universe if there was nothing experiencing it?

          Who or what is it “best” for?

            • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Us. Conscious creatures humans or otherwise. We are the genesis of “point”.

              By analogy, what’s the point of a sun, or a planet, being a thing? It just is, right? A mechanism of nature.

              Maybe we are do, but it’s undeniable tjsybwe experience reality. Experience is the only thing they can have a point, by definition. This is simply axiomatic.

              There is no knowing a universe without knowers, so whether something just is, absent is, is a nonsense question. Sense to whom, after all?

              • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 minutes ago

                Why does the universe need to be known?

                What makes ‘us’ so special that the worth of a whole universe is determined by our existence, inspite of the brevity of human history? Written history has only been around for 5,000. The oldest homo sapiens has only been around for 300,000 years. Was the universe insignificant for the rest of its 13,799,700,000 years?

              • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Maybe we are do, but it’s undeniable tjsybwe experience reality.

                I’m sticking that as text over an image of Neil DeGrasse Tyson.

        • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It’s a cool axiom though. I mean if there’s nothing conscious to know the universe exists, like, so what? A universe needs life to matter to that life. Intrinsic mattering makes no sense. Things have to matter to other things that have the capacity to want or need. But without consciousness, those things might as well be like calculations in a computer.

          • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            We are the cosmos pondering itself.

            Carl Sagan said it more or this way and he was right.

      • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        One minor problem is that life as we know it is supported by the continuous input of energy from a nearby star. Without it, no photosynthesis, and nearly all primary energy production in Earth life comes from that.

        The slightly bigger problem is that by the time there are only black holes, there are no planets. Because, you know, there’s only black holes. So nothing outside of black holes for life to be on, and the vacuum of space isn’t really the most conducive to life or interaction of any kind.