Nitpick: if we had AGI at all, it would be intelligent. You’re referencing LLMs which certainly have no intelligence in how they work.
It’s a good thing we don’t have AGI too, as we’re doing terribly in regulation and control of the pseudo AI that’s available. AGI may not ever become a thing, or it may take a while, or it may be soon. We won’t be ready for it regardless at this rate, and we may not even realize what happened.
My bad, edition error - I initially wrote “AI”*, but then because translating drunk what you often say is a PITA for some reason replaced it with “AGI”. Thanks for pointing it out, I’ll fix it.
I agree the current lack of truly intelligent systems is a good thing.
*as in, the generic label used nowadays towards those systems, regardless of being actually intelligent or not.
No shit.
As I often joke: the only people who genuinely believe
AGIAI is intelligent now or soon are the ones lacking themselves intelligence.Nitpick: if we had AGI at all, it would be intelligent. You’re referencing LLMs which certainly have no intelligence in how they work.
It’s a good thing we don’t have AGI too, as we’re doing terribly in regulation and control of the pseudo AI that’s available. AGI may not ever become a thing, or it may take a while, or it may be soon. We won’t be ready for it regardless at this rate, and we may not even realize what happened.
My bad, edition error - I initially wrote “AI”*, but then
because translating drunk what you often say is a PITAfor some reason replaced it with “AGI”. Thanks for pointing it out, I’ll fix it.I agree the current lack of truly intelligent systems is a good thing.
*as in, the generic label used nowadays towards those systems, regardless of being actually intelligent or not.