• LordCrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    17 hours ago

    My PMs are all about time allocation… yet they fail to understand what research is.

    Pm: How long until you finish designing and implementing this thing?

    Me: I cant put a time on it, weve never done this before and have no points of reference. So i could figure it out today or a month from today…i cant give you a time because its bever been implemented.

    PM: Sighs in dissapproval… ill just say 5 business days. Hows that.

    Me: if we are just making up numbers, sure

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I used to tell my bosses that everything would take three months. I would then ensure that everything took three months, usually by fucking off for two and a half months and then blasting something out in the last two weeks.

    • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Sounds like you got someone with experience in hardware. They’re all about just shitting a date on paper.

      The key to good PMs seems to be that they will make up the fake schedule without even talking to you. The schedule will be made up either way, so if they can not bother me that’s a ok.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        My good PMs understood that their role was to attend meetings and create a buffer between myself (who understood what had to be done and was doing most of the work) and the higher-ups. The awful PMs were the ones who thought they were running the show and driving everything.

        • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Our current PM gets involved in projects from day dot. Plans out vague technical ideas, makes up timelines, gets involved in meetings and suggests things to clients, totally rules the roost.

          Shame she’s completely fucking clueless about any of the actual work, really.

          • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I usually preferred male PMs, solely because my contempt for their lack of technical knowledge was never mistaken for chauvinism. Women PMs who stayed in their lane – or even better were actually technically competent – were A-OK with me.

            • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              Oh yeah, it’s difficult to criticise her because it is a bloke criticising a woman and it just comes off poorly, despite my issues with her being absolutely nothing to do with her identity. I think I’ve had one or two mostly good PMs in maybe eight jobs across my career so far?