• Oppopity@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The point is that a system where you just vote for a guy every four years won’t change anything because the rich are in charge and have all the power.

    Without having the people in power there can’t be democracy.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          I’m not a USian, but I do know how their jury duty works. Yeah, it’s been over a decade since I last went to history class, I’d completely forgotten about this system and I guess I don’t think outside of the box enough to come up with it myself. There are some negatives I can think of, but some few positives too.

          Here’s my biggest concern, and I’m hoping that maybe you have an answer: Outside of the US, MOST people who get into politics are at least decently educated. MOST voters prefer intelligent and well-educated candidates. Most of them, not all of course. If everyone is eligible and there’s no filtering happening, a bunch of honest to god dumbfucks might be chosen by random chance. You COULD give it an education requirement, but then a lot of otherwise intelligent and well-meaning people who didn’t finish school for one reason or another, are disqualified. IQ tests can have unwanted cultural, racial and socioeconomic biases. How do you make sure that there aren’t too many ridiculously unqualified people chosen, without outright imposing requirements that could be unfair?