So presumably you can’t forgive most westerners.

Still not sure you know what “presumably” means.

Most Westerners are currently what I call Nazis, so forgiveness would be a long way away for them, but this is the first time I’ve said that in this thread, and I can’t remember the context you’re saying it came up in sooner.

You have no idea of why they might be on a plane.

I can guess based on their reply to me that it’s not worth it.

Hell, for all you know it’s visiting family across the world.

My mom kept ignoring me saying she shouldn’t pollute the AIR WE FUCKING BREATHE to visit her sister who was dying of cancer, and now she cries about it regularly.

I feel horrible for her. I wish there was a better outcome for her than having a son who knows more than her, while she refuses to listen, and hates herself for it.

I don’t currently have energy left, after thinking about that, to give a fuck what an online stranger who insults me for no reason is going through. Did you think I’d give a fuck? Was there a reason for you to think that? Do you think the fucking survival of the planet isn’t as high on my list of priorities as it should be?

I didn’t ask what you can imagine them doing, so why did you waste time typing that?

Not sure why you even care about much of this to begin with then.

So you asked me about anarcho-primitivism while having no idea what it is? That would be an impressive level of stupidity if it wasn’t just an abnormal level of dishonesty instead.

That’s me explaining why cutting out pedophile sites reduces pedophile business opportunities.

But I didn’t ask, so why waste time typing it?

It is 100% related here.

Nope, especially not at the part you inserted it in, where the topic was how you said the business is “gutted.”

I did. It’s not self-explanatory at all.

Secret-keeping is a pretty well-known capability of three-letter agencies. How old are most people when they learn that? 3? 4 at the most, probably?

It might feel intuitive, but you’re assuming that when these sites are shut down that data isn’t being sent to the authorities.

I don’t get what you mean. The data is taken away from me, so I can’t give authority to myself in that context. The people I’ve been calling “the authorities” are the people who take it down, of course they have it.

You haven’t really. You’re all over the place on this.

Incorrect, and willingly so, like so many of your other attempts to gaslight me.

It’s incorrect?

You don’t know what “borderline incorrect” means? Or you like, need me to pick one?

So we should censor or block access to some things but not all things that could be acquired, in theory, on TOR?

Who’s “we?”

I am not helping you with shit like this, or letting you help me with it, in any direct way. “We” can work at a certain degree of separation until you learn a useful enough skill to compensate for being an abusive psycho

So whether or not you see it doesn’t mean you’re more likely to catch them.

Incorrect. I cannot catch people I’m not aware of. I have some chance of catching people I’m aware of. That is a difference in likelihood.

Perhaps you had me confused with yourself, who are too abusive, selfish, and dishonest to even try being useful.

Again: Baseless conjecture from you.

Incorrect. I have not been posting any baseless conjecture here.

You literally just said here that it shouldn’t be removable.

Not clicking that, don’t remember what I was asking about. Want to explain with screenshots, or was it just another time-wasting thing that’s not actually important?

I said: “So you outright openly pro people’s right to share child porn online.”

Your reply: “Correct, but phrased with edgy wording I wouldn’t usually use.”

Correct, and weird place to end the comment. Seems like you were in the middle of explaining something, and then stopped.