Curious where others might stand.
My day to day “coding” is reviewing, revising and running plans against LLM/code-assistant tools. I juggle around 2-3 sessions of this on various features or tasks at a time.
Curious where others might stand.
My day to day “coding” is reviewing, revising and running plans against LLM/code-assistant tools. I juggle around 2-3 sessions of this on various features or tasks at a time.
I’m on the fence here.
I’m still steering and guiding the design - with knowledge gained over many products, features and incidents - and am reviewing it.
To scale higher such that I could be replaced then I think the change sets would have to be smaller and/or we have perfected bug/incident detection and remediation such that we can bypass human review of the code.