• village604@adultswim.fan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Tell me you haven’t read the bill without telling me you haven’t read the bill.

    It absolutely does not place restrictions on the use of personal property. It does the exact opposite.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s a whopping 6 pages and mostly double-spaced and more white space. And lemmy upvotes these cynical comments without a shred of investigation.

      I’m reading it as making data centers harder to block, now I’m not so sure. Your take?

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        The bill explicitly states that data centers being a public nuisance is a “Compelling government interest,” so I don’t think it’s geared towards protecting data centers.

        taking actions that prevent or abate common law nuisances created by physical datacenter infrastructure.

        Edit: there is one major issue with the bill; it still keeps the door open for age verification.